Comparing to the BBC one,
I somehow feel more comfortable with the way that CNN conducted the interview.













I kinda felt that the questions thrown out by the interviewer at HardTalk of BBC were sometimes too inducing and lacking of objectivity. Seemed to intend to find some possible flaws in the words and terms used by Ma and draw some conclusions and/or inferences from that. Really critical.


This CNN one is more pleasant.


Now I realize why we are taught in LSE to write essays in an extreme critical way.

Quesara 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()